Knowledge-Based Decision Support System for Hotel Room Recommendation and Maintenance Prioritization Using Mamdani Fuzzy Logic

Authors

  • Sri Widaningsih Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Suryakancana, Cianjur, Indonesia
  • Agus Suheri Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Suryakancana, Cianjur, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Hasnan Ali Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Suryakancana, Cianjur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36080/idealis.v9i2.3802

Keywords:

Fuzzy Logic, mamdani, room recommendation, repair priority, decision support system

Abstract

To improve service quality, hotel management must make decisions quickly and accurately, particularly in providing hotel room recommendations to guests and determining room maintenance priorities by reception staff. However, these decisions are often challenged by uncertainty and subjective considerations. This research is primarily driven by the goal to construct a knowledge-based decision support system. at Hotel Pusaka Mulya that not only facilitates hotel administrative management but also supports accurate room recommendation decisions based on guest preferences and effective prioritization of room maintenance activities. A knowledge-based decision support system leveraging the Mamdani fuzzy reasoning technique is developed as the core of this proposed framework.. The input variables for room recommendation include price, facilities, comfort level, and number of occupants, while the output variable is the room type, consisting of Standard , Standard 1 , Superior 1 , Superior 2 , and Superior 3 . Meanwhile, the input variables for maintenance priority determination are cost, time, and level of damage, with output categories classified as low, medium, and high priority. The Mamdani fuzzy inference process consists of four stages: fuzzification, implication, aggregation using the MAX operator, and defuzzification using the centroid method. The software development process follows the waterfall model, encompassing the phases of analysis, design, implementation, and testing. The testing results demonstrate that the Mamdani Fuzzy  is capable of generating recommendations efficiently and accurately in accordance with the defined decision criteria based on an 80% validation accuracy for room recommendations and an 85% accuracy for determining improvement priorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Yulianto and C. U. Mayasari, “Hubungan Jumlah Objek Wisata, Hotel Dan Biro Perjalanan Dengan Jumlah Wisatawan Ke D.I.Y.,” Pariwisata, vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal. bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jp

[2] R. Azzahra and H. Hendrawan, “Pengaruh Penerimaan Pajak Hotel Dan Pajak Restoran Terhadap Pendapatan Asli Daerah Di Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kota Bogor,” General Bookkeeping Service Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70–78, 2024.

[3] R. Nengsih and B. Saputra, “Analisis Kontribusi Pajak Hotel dan Pajak Restoran Terhadap Pendapataan Asli Daerah: Studi Pada Kota Wisata Bukittinggi,” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi (AsIAN), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2025, doi: 10.47828/jianaasian.v13i2.364.

[4] H. T. Nauli, M. Ismail, and M. Susanti, “Pengaruh Penerimaan Pajak Hotel Dan Pajak Restoran Terhadap Pendapatan Asli Daerah (Studi Kasus Pada Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kota Bekasi),” Performance, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 305–316, 2024.

[5] S. A. Laksono, “Pengaruh Pajak Hotel dan Pajak Restoran terhadap Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) Kota Jambi Tahun 2013–2024,” ARZUSIN, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2359–2379, 2025, doi: 10.58578/arzusin.v5i5.7513.

[6] N. Sanida and D. Rahayu, “Pengaruh Jumlah Wisatawan dan Jumlah Hotel terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Provinsi Lampung,” Jurnal Humanitas, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 704–719, 2026.

[7] P. I. Mallios and N. F. Matsatsinis, “Decision support system applications (1980-2022). Classification and statistical analysis,” Int. J. Decision Support Systems, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 173–212, 2025.

[8] M. Sànchez-Marrè, Intelligent Decision Support Systems. Switzerland: Springer Cham, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87790-3.

[9] G. Tsihrintzis, M. Virvou, H. Doukas, and L. Jain, “Introduction to Advances in Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Decision Support Systems,” in Advances in Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Decision Support Systems, 2024, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-62316-5_1.

[10] L. Li and Y. Xu, “An extended hesitant fuzzy set for modeling multi-source uncertainty and its applications in multiple-attribute decision-making,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 238, p. 121834, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121834.

[11] A. Kumar and S. Bhadoriya, “A Critical Review Of Fuzzy Inference Systems For Decision Support Applications With Special Reference To The Mamdani Model,” International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 36–44, 2022, doi: 10.29121/ijoest.v6.i6.2022.754.

[12] F. N. Shahmohammad, Y. Pourrahimian, and N. Akbari-Gharalari, “Synthesizing complexity: Trends, challenges, and future directions in fuzzy-based multicriteria decision-making (FMCDM) methods,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 167, p. 112362, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112362.

[13] R. Ananda Zilasar, Y. Agus Pranoto, and F. X. Ariwibisono, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Produk Kaca Dan Cermin Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy AHP,” Idealis: Indonesia Journal Information System, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2026, [Online]. Available: http://jom.fti.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/IDEALIS/indexRomazAnandaZilasar |http://jom.fti.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/IDEALIS/index|

[14] R. N. Aini and A. U. Hamdani, “Perancangan Model SPK Dalam Penilaian Guru Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Dan SAW Studi Kasus : SDIT Yasir Cipondoh,” Idealis: Indonesia Journal Information System, no. 2, pp. 182–189, 2019.

[15] M. R. T. Nugroho, R. Winanjaya, and Susiani, “Implementasi Metode Fuzzy Mamdani dalam Menangani Ketersediaan Kamar Pada Tahun 2022 di Hotel Inna Parapat,” Jomlai: Journal of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2023, doi: 10.55123/jomlai.v2i2.2368.

[16] Furizal, A. Ma’arif, S. A. Wijaya, Murni, and I. Suwarno, “Analysis and Performance Comparison of Fuzzy Inference Systems in Handling Uncertainty: A Review,” Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1203–1215, 2024, doi: 10.18196/jrc.v5i4.22123.

[17] R. Rumfot, Y. A. Lesnussa, and D. L. Rahakbauw, “Perbandingan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani, Sugeno Dan Tsukamoto Untuk Menentukan Jumlah Produksi Batu Pecah,” Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 157–168, 2024.

[18] A. Burhanuddin, “Analisis Komparatif Inferensi Fuzzy Tsukamoto, Mamdani dan Sugeno Terhadap Produktivitas Padi di Indonesia,” Ledger: Journal Informatic and Information Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2023.

Downloads

Published

07/31/2026

How to Cite

[1]
S. Widaningsih, Agus Suheri, and Mohammad Hasnan Ali, “Knowledge-Based Decision Support System for Hotel Room Recommendation and Maintenance Prioritization Using Mamdani Fuzzy Logic”, IDEALIS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 247–258, Jul. 2026.